Quantcast
Channel: Bado's blog
Viewing all 2267 articles
Browse latest View live

Paul Krassner on the Art of Offensive Cartoons

$
0
0
Michael Dooley in Imprint.



An interview with Paul Krassner with samples of cartoons that have appeared in The Realist.

Paul Krassner on Obama, Orgies, and the Art of Offensive Cartoons

by MICHAEL DOOLEY on NOVEMBER 30, 2012

There's something oddly funny about Paul Krassner. And it's been going on for more than 50 years.

He palled around with Lenny Bruce, the pioneering 1950s "sick" comic, and even edited Bruce's autobiography, How to Talk Dirty and Influence People. He was instrumental in founding the Yippies!, those radical "Groucho Marxists" who fought the establishment in the late 1960s with theatrical, absurdist guerrilla monkeyshines. And as the editor of The Realist he paved the way for The Simpsons, The Daily Show, and Bill Maher. Kurt Vonnegut and Lewis Black are just two of the legions of fans who cite him as a major influence and inspiration.

The Realist was a proto-underground magazine of "Free-thought Criticism and Satire" begun in 1958. In its heyday, everyone from Norman Mailer and Joseph Heller to Woody Allen and Dick Gregory to Ken Kesey and Tim Leary to Art Spiegelman and S. Clay Wilson appeared on its cheap newsprint pages. Krassner's most notorious publishing prank was his "Parts That Were Left Out of the Kennedy Book" hoax in 1967, presented as actual excerpts that Jacqueline Kennedy had removed from William Manchester's The Death of a President prior to publication. Defying conventional norms of taste and decency, its climactic scene involved Jackie discovering LBJ engaged in necrophilia with JFK's corpse on Air Force One. Many believed it was true, including Pentagon Papers leaker Daniel Ellsberg. You can read the full story in Krassner's newly updated Confessions of a Raving, Unconfined Nut: Misadventures in the Counterculture.

Uncle Paul wants YOU… to be offended. Exclusive illustration for Imprint by Scott Gandell.


I was tricked into buying my first issue of The Realist. I'd been attracted by a cover illustration that looked like a Jules Feiffer cartoon but which turned out to be a clever parody (see below). Euphoric from the revelation that I'd been duped, and from the magazine's provocative and challenging contents, I immediately ordered all available back issues. I also enrolled in the Free University classes Krassner mentions in the following interview. His guest speakers were a wide assortment of countercultural icons, including Abbie Hoffman, a pre–Saturday Night Live Michael O’Donoghue (who was then writing the Phoebe Zeit-Geist comic strip for Evergreen Review), and the extremely talented but sadly underappreciated cartoonist Dick Guindon (see his cartoons below).

Paul Krassner at the 2012 San Diego Comic Fest.
Photo by Michael Dooley

I caught up with Krassner recently at San Diego's first annual Comic Fest, a comic book convention with a beatnik and hippie vibe and guests such as the Tits & Clits Comix creator Joyce Farmer and the National Lampoon art director Michael Gross. During his spotlight presentation, Krassner discussed The Realist's infamous Disneyland Memorial Orgy cartoon drawn by Wally Wood, which depicted the anarchic antics of Uncle Walt's cartoon creatures following the death of their God (seen in the foreground of the photo above). He is currently selling it as a poster on his website.

The following is our conversation about cartoons and controversies, with samples of cartoons that have appeared in The Realist.
.

You can find The Realist's entire 146-issue run here. My thanks to Paul and Ethan Persoff for the images below. And the caption quotes are from Krassner's "In Praise of Offensive Cartoons" essay in my book, The Education of a Comics Artist.

"In 1971, Stewart Brand invited Ken Kesey and me to edit The Last Supplement to the Whole Earth Catalog, which would also serve as an issue of The Realist. Kesey had been reading a book of African Koruba stories. The moral of one parable was, 'He who shits in the road will meet flies on his return.' With that as a theme, we assigned R. Crumb to draw his version of the Last Supper." March 1971

As the father of the Underground Press—your paternity test came back positive—you’re also the uncle of Underground Comix; who among this unruly brood do you most admire?

Well, it’s a species. Dan O’Neill, R. Crumb, Jay Lynch, Jay Kinney, Bill Griffith, Diane Noomin, Trina Robbins, S. Clay Wilson, Gilbert Shelton, Kim Deitch, Spain Rodriguez*, Melinda Gebbie, Bhob Stewart, Rick Griffin, Shary Flenniken, Ron Cobb, Justin Green, Vaughn Bode,and Art Spiegelman come to mind. With a variety of unique styles, these artists all had in common an acute case of irreverence, a stoned-or-straight imagination, a passionate sense of humor infused with justice and raunchiness, and an uncanny ability to articulate the consciousness—and the subconsciousness—of their countercultural audience.

[*Editor's note: After this article was completed, we learned that the great Zap Comix artist Spain Rodriguez had passed away. Read more about his life and work in the San Francisco Chronicle's obituary.]

When was the last time you were offended by a cartoon?

Over the last several years, not just one specific cartoon, but, again, a whole species. Namely: images and captions that reeked with racist hatred toward Barack Obama.

On the subject of Obama caricatures, what's your take on Barry Blitt’s 2008 “fist bump” cover? I felt that The New Yorker’s soft, Eustace Tilly style would’ve worked better as an illustration for a "Politics of Hate” feature inside a magazine, and that a grittier, graffiti-scrawl rendering of the same image would have made a more clear, concise cover statement.

Well, although I understood how people with a pro-Obama agenda might have worried that the cover would be misunderstood by a severely dumbed-down public, I thought it was a brilliant parody of the inaccurate negative stereotypes perpetuated by the right-wing propaganda machine. I felt Blitt captured the mood just fine.




So you also don't believe that Blitt's image can be de-legitimized in any way, even though anti-Obama hatemongers could easily appropriate it for their own cause?

Nope. Rod Serling once had a scene in one of his films—I forget what, but let’s just say it was a victim being sodomized with a broomstick—and a viewer did a copycat crime in real life. Serling said, “I am responsible to my fans, not for them.”

Okay, here’s a better example. Several decades ago, I was teaching a course, “Satire and Journalism, and How to Tell the Difference,” at the Free University in New York. There was a cartoon in The New Yorker showing a pianist standing at the front of a stage, announcing that, “Before I begin my concert, I just want to say that I’m opposed to the Vietnam War.” We had a class discussion about how subscribers to the conservative National Review would’ve experienced that cartoon on their magazine differently.

What contemporary cartoonists make you laugh?

Garry Trudeau. Dwayne “Mr. Fish” Booth. Wiley Miller—I fondly remember his syndicated comic strip, Non Sequitur, that presented a sidewalk artist who “finally achieves his goal to be the most feared man in the world,” with his placard advertising, “Caricatures of Muhammad While You Wait!”




So, what was your take on the Muhammad cartoons controversies?

As a secular humanist, I found it simultaneously tragic and absurd to witness so much unspeakable anguish caused by religious wars in the Middle East, being fought over deities in whose existence I disbelieve—Jehovah vs. Allah, Jesus vs. Muhammad—and, as a free speech advocate, to witness the death and destruction triggered by Danish cartoonists’ depictions of the Islamic prophet.

There are basic principles of semantics concerning symbolism—the menu is not the meal; the map is not the territory—which in this case serve only to intensify both the tragedy and the absurdity.

On what grounds did you reject cartoons submitted to The Realist?

If it wasn't controversial enough, or lacked a sense of provocation, or the humor was really corny, or it perpetuated stereotypes, or it was simply something I had no urge to share.

Since one of your goals as editor of The Realist was to put yourself out of business, you must feel a sense of accomplishment from recent book collections like Blown Covers: New Yorker Covers You Were Never Meant to See [discussed here] and The Best of the Rejection Collection: 294 Cartoons That Were Too Dumb, Too Dark, or Too Naughty for The New Yorker. Still, post-retirement, do you ever feel tempted to publish material such as “The Parts Left Out of The Rejection Collection”? Or maybe a “Star Wars Memorial Orgy”?

Here’s the nail you hit smack on the head. You’ve just committed satirical prophecy, because I’m surrendering to that temptation right here on this very page, right at this very moment. I used to publish cartoons that were rejected by The New Yorker—too controversial or just plain bad taste—including my old friend Mort Gerberg. Upon the re-election of President Obama, he had the cartoon below rejected by The New Yorker. Instead, it was published in the weekly Columbia Paper in his regular “Out of Line” panel on the editorial page.


Mort Gerberg, November 2012


Do you have any cartoon-related predictions for 2013?

Inspired by your notion of a “Star Wars Memorial Orgy,” a cartoon will portray a SWAT team busting George Lucas for fucking the rotted corpse of Walt Disney.

May the farce be with you.

"When the Cuban missile crisis occurred, Richard Guindon created his most popular cartoon for The Realist... The cartoon captured a feeling of powerlessness that permeated the country." November 1962


"Syndicated editorial cartoonist Frank Interlandi... told me that he simply could not conceive of a more appropriate reaction." February 1961.

"Syndicated editorial cartoonist Frank Interlandi... told me that he simply could not conceive of a more appropriate reaction." February 1961.

Dick Guindon, May/June 1970


Charles Rodrigues, September 1968


Mort Gerberg, September 1966

"New Yorker regulars sent me their cartoons that were rejected for controversial subject matter, poor taste, and taboo violation." left: An unnamed New Yorker cartoonist, September 1966. right: "Lee Lorenz sent a cartoon, bypassing The New Yorker because he knew it would be rejected." June 1967

Text by Paul Krassner, illustration by Bhob Stewart, October 1965

"John Francis Putnam, Mad's art director, whose column in The Realist was titled 'Modest Proposals,' wrote one about the apocryphal publication of a collection, Tillie and Mac: Those Little Comic Books that Men Like, resulting in an obscenity charge. Accompanying this was Mad's Sergio Aragones' hysterical full-page parody of the genre." March 1971

Psychedelicized logo by Jay Lynch, June 1967. The top left story opens Paul Krassner's follow-up report on his "Parts That Were Left Out of the Kennedy Book."

Dan O'Neill, opening spread of a story, October 1972


Left: B Kliban, April 1964. Right: Sam Gross, April 1966

"The Realist was the first to publish Sam Gross, a mild-mannered accountant who visited my office with his samples one day and eventually replaced Charles Addams as the king of macabre cartoonists. ... 'Humor of the Handicapped' was offensive to many, though lauded by disabled readers." June 1964

Frank Cieciorka, March 1964

Richard Guindon, August 1966

Edward Sorel, June 1967

Robert Grossman, October 1972


"During a period of severe anti-Communist hysteria throughout the nation, John Francis Putnam and I responded by designing a patriotic poster." 1963


See also: The Insider's Guide To Creating Comics And Graphic Novels, available at MyDesignShop.com.

Read more: Paul Krassner on the Art of Offensive Cartoons
For great design products, visit our online store: MyDesignShop.com

Richard's Poor Almanac debuts on GoComics

$
0
0
Michael Cavna in Comic Riffs.



The Post fans were first.

It was the readers of The Washington Post who, of course, first enjoyed and embraced “Richard’s Poor Almanac,” Richard Thompson’s weekly comic that debuted in 1997 and ran in the Style section. The feature won a national following, combining the wry whimsy and exquisite artwork of a now-acknowledged cartoon genius during its decade-plus run.



“I’m pleased and proud that GoComics is rerunning ‘Richard’s Poor Almanac,’ “ Thompson tells Comic Riffs over the weekend. Whole new generations of comics fans will now have access to my stale, dated juvenilia.”

It was “Richard’s Poor Almanac,” of course — specifically the Bush inaugural cartoon “Make the Pie Higher” — that caught the eye of Andrews McMeel editors and led to the syndication in 2007 of Thompson’s daily strip “Cul de Sac.”

Thompson ended “Richard’s Poor Almanac” a short time later. “Cul de Sac” ran till this past fall, when Thompson ended the Reuben Award-winning strip, citing his efforts to battle Parkinson’s disease.

Among “Richard’s Poor Almanac’s” many fans was the Pulitzer-winning political-cartooning legend Pat Oliphant, who wrote the foreword for the 2004 collection “Richard’s Poor Almanac: 12 Months of Misinformation in Handy Cartoon Form.”

[The Post Magazine profile: Thompson battles what ails his industry — and his body — with characteristic wit]

Richard Thompson, The Washington Post









Seth on the end of Bazooka Joe Comics

$
0
0
From Sequential.


Topps recently announced the discontinuation of its long-running Bazooka Joe comic strip, since 1954 a popular addition to its bubblegum packaging.  The strip has a storied history (ironically the subject of an upcoming celebratory book from Abrams ComicArt, Bazooka Joe and His Gang: A 60th Anniversry Collection). For many years the gags were written by Underground comics legend Jay Lynch and drawn by former Tijuana Bible cartoonist Wesley Morse. According to The New York Times, the gum company executives have decided to rebrand, reducing the iconic character to the role of occasional spokesperson/mascot, stating, “What we’re trying to do with the relaunch is to make the brand relevant again to today’s kids.”
Sequential asked cartoonist Seth, creator of the Jocko gum-machine giveaway comic, and a Bazooka Joe collector of long-standing, to comment on the news.







“Contrary to popular opinion, I am NOT more of a Pud fan than a Bazooka Joe fan (though Pud had his charms as well)! Bazooka Joe is definitely my favourite of the two. However, that said, when I heard that Topps was discontinuing the little comics in the gum I mentally shrugged. “Who cares?”, I thought. They killed the real Bazooka Joe decades ago anyway. Whatever modern version is currently being given away with the gum is surely some sort of abomination (I’m assuming). Still, some part of me felt kind of disappointed to hear it. One less anachronism in the world. Even if those little modern comics are utterly horrible ….it’s still sort of charming that today’s kids were unwrapping their gum and reading a comic strip for one second before they balled it up and tossed it away and turned back to their electronic distracter. A minor continuity of childhood stretching back to the mid 20th century, I s’pose.


Truthfully I wish there were a lot more of these sort of things in the world. Why didn’t every candy company put a comic or gag cartoon in with their product? Why didn’t Cracker Jack put a whole little comic book into the box in their heyday (a disappointing comic book where every page would’ve been accidently glued together by molasses and caramel corn)? Those tiny Bazooka Joe comics were such a great little marketing tool and I always thought that Topps was fairly brilliant to have thought up the idea.
Though thinking about it –I’m ashamed to admit it I’m not sure who came up with it first. Was it Fleer or Topps? Either way– a smart, sweet little idea. Innocent almost. I cannot imagine why Topps would bother discontinuing the only element of their gum that makes it worth buying? But then, it’s the classic kind of stupid business move that “clear-cutting” pop-culture businesses make all the time. They don’t recognize something interesting in their midst until they have ruined it. Look to the entire history of mainstream comic books to support this statement.
I must say, I always deeply enjoyed the poor quality of the old Bazooka Joe strips. There was something inherently odd about those strips and that tiny world of the characters. They seemed to take place just around the corner from some better kid strip –like Peanuts or maybe Little Lulu. Just over on the other side of the fence where the world was still vaguely 1930′s. A neighbourhood where the people never digressed in speech because they were only allowed 3 words per balloon (less in their Canadian neighbourhood since they had to squeeze in a French translation as well!).
So many of those waxy comics passed through your little hands as a child and yet you never really had any sense whatsoever of who those characters were. They all seemed like bit players. As often commented –the only elements remembered about them were their oddities. Joe’s eye patch, Mort’s sweater, Percy’s cowboy suit and Herman’s obesity. The little girl (Jane?) was memorable only because she was the only girl (at least the only one I remember). When I found out that the strip’s cartoonist was also a pornographer back in the 30′s I could not have been happier. It somehow made Bazooka Joe even more perfect.
Loving Bazooka Joe has always been about loving the IDEA of something. Little strips going out into the world wrapped around gum for little children. That’s great. Pure. Simple.


There really was nothing much else to love about it but the idea. I have hundreds of Bazooka Joe strips in a binder in my library. I’m never going to reread those. There is nothing to re-read. They exist as an object. An artifact of an idea. So, I guess I am sorry that this charming old fashioned idea is passing out of the charmless world we live in today. But as I said, they’d already wrung most of the flavour out of this thing 20 years ago (much like well-chewed gum) so I’m not crying about it either. Thank God Jack Chick is still passing out his classic-cartoon-styled hate literature on city benches. There’s so little of these ephemeral kind of oddities left in the world. One less now.”

Dave Brown wins Political Cartoon of the Year 2012

$
0
0
From The Independent.



A cartoon by The Independent's Dave Brown has been named Political Cartoon of the Year 2012.
The cartoon,  'The Last, Last, Last Chance Saloon' (above) was published in last Saturday’s paper, and shows David Cameron's response to Lord Leveson's report. The cartoon was inspired by a painting by Degas.
The award, presented annually by the Political Cartoon Society, was voted for by the society's members together with the cartoonists of all the national newspapers in a ceremony at the Ellwood Atfield Gallery in Westminster's Smith Square on Tuesday night.
Dave Brown has previously won the Cartoon of the Year Award in 2003, 2006, and 2010.

Tintin's Congo Adventure 'Not Racist', Court Says

$
0
0
From Sky News.



A Belgian court says the cartoon, which is sold in the UK with the warning it includes racist content, is "full of gentle humour".


Tintin in the Congo is not racist, but a story full of "gentle and candid humour", according to the Belgian Appeals court.

The second of Herge's adventures of the boy reporter and his dog Tintin features the character of a stupid black helper and a woman who at one point says: "White man very great."

The cartoon strip, which was written in the 1920s, is sold in Britain with the warning that it includes racist content, following a ruling in a British court in 2007.

However, the Belgian court rejected claims of racism and the argument that the book was full of negative racist attitudes that could still have an impact on children who read it today.

Bienvenu Mbutu Mondondo told the Belgian court the comic strip was racist


The appeal had been brought after a 2011 ruling which found that Tintin was not racist and should not be banned.

It was brought by a Congolese immigrant, Bienvenu Mbutu Mondondo, and the Belgian Council of Black Associations.

He said the book should be banned in Belgium, which has a history of colonial aggression, exploitation and violence in the Congo, because of the number of damaging black stereotypes.

He said that Tintin employed a little black helper who was seen as "stupid and without qualities".

Tintin figures made by Congolese artist Auguy Kakese to sell to tourists


"It makes people think that blacks have not evolved," he said.

In one scene, a black woman prostrates herself before Tintin, saying: "White man very great. White mister is big juju man."

Alain Amici, a lawyer for Mr Mondondo's group, told the court at the original case in 2011: "The negative stereotypes portrayed in this book are still read by a significant number of children. They have an impact on their behaviour."

Even Tintin author Hergé, whose real name was Georges Remi, admitted in later life that the cartoon strip was a "youthful sin" and reflected the prejudices of its time.

The group has also tried to have the cartoon banned in France, but failed.


2013 Editorial Cartoonists Convention to be held in Salt Lake City

$
0
0
Alan Gardner in The Daily Cartoonist.



AAEC Logo
Next years convention of the Association of American Editorial Cartoonists will be held in Salt Lake City, UT. Salt Lake Tribune editorial cartoonist Pat Bagley will be heading up the local logistics of the hosting. I asked him a few questions about the announcement and what we can expect.
A: Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe this is the first time the AAEC has come to Salt Lake City, right?
P: This will be a first for Salt Lake and Utah. And I didn’t even have to dispense bribes.
A: Do you have a vision yet for the format or venue of the convention?
P: The AAEC will be exploring all of the possibilities, but I see a relaxed, wide-ranging venue with activities open to public participation. It will be equal parts showing off our great state to my peers and showing off some of the greatest creative talent in the country to my fellow Utahns. I’ve talked to several community leaders and they’re all eager to help and participate in our party. I see a lot of love. In fact, you could call it Big Love.

A: Who would be at the top of your speaker list for the keynote?
P: I have some candidates in mind but don’t want to say anything before running it by the board. It’s too bad our fellow Utahn, Big Daddy “Ratfink” Roth, is no longer around. He would have been perfect.
A: Are there tentative dates yet?
P: We are looking at the last half of June. I will keep you posted.
A: Back when Salt Lake City was trying to win the 2002 Olympics there was a lot of consternation about the restrictive local liquor laws. The laws have changed a bit since then, but Utah’s reputation may not have. What would you tell individuals who might be thinking it would be a dry AAEC convention?
P: Here’s how I put it in the proposal. “You can get a drink in Utah. In fact, you can get several. Liquor flows freely in most restaurants and Salt Lake is home to several award-winning brew pubs. Beer is available in grocery stores while wine and spirits are sequestered in state run liquor stores. Bring your ID.”
As a local I’m looking forward to it and I know several others who will be as well. The Salt Lake area has a lot of organizations who, as Pat mentions, will be a natural fit and supporters of the convention.


Globe & Mail Editorial Cartoonist Brian Gable on "16x9"

$
0
0


Here are some of the cartoons featured in the documentary:

Lance Armstrong by Brian Gable

Christian Vachon by Anthony Jenkins

Idi Amin Dada by Aislin


Kal profiled in "The Economist"

$
0
0
"Drawing much more than a line" in The Economist.

KAL, Calendar for The World in 2013

After a day when we were all mulling over big data, small food, cyber-warfare, rising economies and fiscal cliffs, Kevin “KAL” Kallaugher, The Economist’s editorial cartoonist, summed up The World in 2013 Festival in New York as only he can—with a whiteboard, a Sharpie pen and his uniquely witty take on the likely events of 2013.

In fact, the year 2013 has a particular meaning for KAL: it will be his 35th year with The Economist. As he admits, it wasn’t quite supposed to be this way. Although he had always wanted to be a cartoonist, KAL had imagined creating a comic strip or becoming an animator. Fate took him in another direction when, after graduating from Harvard, he set out on a bicycle tour of Britain. He settled in Brighton where he became player and coach to the Brighton Basketball Club (he still shoots hoops with an assurance that should put some NBA millionaires to shame). To make a living when the British failed to embrace basketball with quite the enthusiasm the sport deserves, he drew caricatures of tourists in Trafalgar Square and on Brighton Pier and became a busker and ventriloquist. He even worked as a maintenance man tearing wallpaper off the walls of a local school—but not before illustrating the walls with cartoons. One of the teachers saw his drawings and put him in touch with an art director who, in turn, suggested he tried pitching his work to the newspapers and magazines up and down Fleet Street.

One pitch was to The Economist, who gave him a one-day trial and a brief to draw Denis Healey, a politician well known for his extravagantly hirsute eyebrows. Luckily, KAL had spent the previous evening practising drawing Healey (the only British politician he’d heard of), as he was being interviewed on television—and so The Economist got its first resident cartoonist.

In 1999, KAL was asked to do a regular political cartoon for the paper in addition to his weekly caricatures. He draws (no pun intended) a distinction between political cartoons, which reflect the cartoonist’s personal viewpoint, and caricatures and illustrations, which represent someone else’s point of view. This role of the political cartoonist as journalist can have serious repercussions. Although cartoons rely on humour and satire to make a point, the power of a sharply drawn illustration can have very unfunny consequences. KAL points out that in a majority of nations, cartoonists cannot draw their own head of state for fear of political—and often physical—reprisal. The strong demand for political cartoons in those dangerous areas reflects how much people long for freedom, KAL says, and want to see their world represented with wit and satire.

New platforms, driven by technological advances, have helped to some extent in giving cartoonists more ways to distribute their work. Technology has also brought KAL back to his early ambitions; a selection of his animations can be found on YouTube and on “Sketchblog”, and a new series of animations commissioned by The Economist explaining certain economic terms will be launched soon. There is even a KAL app for your smart phone, and now some experimenting with 3-D caricatures. A retrospective book, tentatively called "Daggers Drawn", that reprints much of his work at The Economist, will be published in the spring of 2013, accompanied by exhibitions and shows.

KAL will be popping up in various places around the world in 2013, but one place you can often find him is in his own drawings—witness the calendar for The World in 2013. Readers with sharp eyes will see a tiny self-portrait tucked away among the flying saucers, Bollywood dancers and the Kentucky Derby. And they can also spot him on the cover of The World in 2013. Cassandra looks forward to taking out the magnifying glass and spying a mini-KAL in his calendar for The World in 2014.

The Economist’s Kallery
World in 2013calendar





Saul Steinberg, Gag Man

$
0
0
From The Desk of Bob Mankoff




... I must admit that I’m a big fan of Saul Steinberg's early cartoons, and am reminded of a great scene in Woody Allen’s Fellini homage, “Stardust Memories,” in which the aliens tell him, much to his dismay, “We enjoy your films, particularly the early, funny ones.”

So let me leave you, laughter lovers, with my homage to Saul Steinberg’s early, funny ones:











Q&A: 10 Questions with Canadian Editorial Cartoonist Terry Mosher

$
0
0
Question and Answer session with George Stroumboulopoulos…

George immortalized in one of his favourite outfits.


Canadian political cartoonist Terry Mosher, AKA Aislin, has led a colourful life.

As a young man, he attended 14 different high schools (in Montreal, Toronto and Quebec city) and won entrance to a fine arts college by forging his high school diploma - he calls the forgery his finest work.

Since then, he's done very well for himself as a Canadian political cartoonist. His work has regularly appeared in print - and sparked conversations, and sometimes controversies - since 1972.

He's also published 19 collections of his cartoons. The latest is titled 'Was It Good For You'.



Terry was kind enough to provide an exclusive cartoon to go with this Q&A:

Here's what Terry had to say about politics, censorship, and the greatest lie he's ever told...

1. You've seen many Prime Ministers come and go. As a satirist, which has been your favourite and why?

TM: Brian Mulroney for the gab, the blarney and the bluster! Furthermore, with the Karlheinz Schreiber affair involving cash in brown envelopes, Mulroney became the gift that just kept on giving.

2. Have you ever had a cartoon turned away by your editors?

TM: Yes, many times. My Gazette editors will reject cartoons for one reason or another on average about three or four times a year. These days, however, it hardly matters. Whenever a cartoon of mine is spiked, I simply put it up on my Facebook page. These are the ones that attract the most hits.

3. Which of your cartoons caused the greatest backlash?

TM: In 1997, an Islamic extremist group attacked a group of tourists in Luxor, Egypt. As a father, I was truly appalled by that particular act of terrorism as young children were systematically slaughtered. Therefore, I drew a vicious cartoon of an Islamic extremist as a dog, knowing full well what an insult that was is in the Islamic world. Furthermore, I added an apology to dogs everywhere (being a dog lover myself).

An outfit in Washington named the Council on American-Islamic Relations organized a massive worldwide email and petition campaign claiming that the cartoon was an attack on Islam in general (despite me having clearly labeled the dog as being an Islamic extremist). At the time, CAIR were in the habit of chasing down cartoonists everywhere.

After a large demonstration was held in front of the newspaper, The Gazette caved and issued a quasi-apology. I never did - and never will.

4. Is any subject off-limits?

TM: Personal matters aren't really any of my business. I don't care who is sleeping with whom for example unless it is somehow affecting an individual's performance in the public arena.

5. When you hear about cartoons causing protests, death threats or worse, attacks on cartoonists, what is your reaction?

TM: I do what I do best and simply draw a cartoon on the matter. Indeed, someone should publish a book of the excellent cartoons that were drawn all around the world in reaction to the hysterical outcry over the Danish Mohammed cartoons.

6. What was the first drawing you got paid for?

TM: In the mid-1960s I was doing the Jack Kerouac thing and hitchhiking all over North America. I drew a caricature of Lyndon Johnson for a poster for a hippie coffee house in Boston called The Boston Tea Party. The owner gave me a cheque for fifty bucks American that didn't bounce. I've been making a living by drawing cartoons ever since.

7. What scares you?

TM: Religious fanaticism of all stripes: Christian, Muslim, Jewish - whatever. Confucians are cool. Mind you, it's not really a religion but more of a guide to social harmony - and I was glad to see while recently in China that it's on the rise there again.

8. What makes you angry?

TM: Many, many things: Certainly intolerance, arrogance and pomposity (not that I haven't been guilty of all of these qualities myself on occasion).

9. What makes a good apology?

TM: A prompt one. Whether a recovering alcoholic or not, the 10th step of Alcoholics Anonymous could serve as a useful tool for everyone.

10. What's the best lie you ever told?

TM: Clarence Campbell, the long-time overlord of the National Hockey League spoke to me once after I gave a speech on cartooning. He told me that he loved my work. In fact, Campbell claimed to love all cartoons with the exception of one that someone had drawn of him selling the Stanley Cup in a pawnshop after the Canada-Russia hockey series in 1972. I agreed that that had been a really cheap shot. I didn't tell him that I had drawn the cartoon.

Cartoon of the week (22)

I Wish I'd Drawn...(22)

$
0
0
.. this hilarious cartoon by Martin Perscheid.



Martin Perscheid is a German cartoonist born February 16, 1966, in Wesseling, Germany. His drawing style resembles that of Gary Larson.
His works have been published since 1994 in various German newspapers and magazines, since 1996 under the title "Perscheids Abgründe" (“Perscheid's Abyss”). Of his many honors, he was winner of the Max and Moritz prize of 2002 for the best German-language Cartoon Series, as well as the "Kulturplakette" (Culture Award) from his hometown of Wesseling.

Best Editorial Cartoons of the Year: 2013 Edition

$
0
0


The "Best Editorial Cartoons of the Year: 2013 Edition" in now published. The yearly retrospective was initiated by the late Charles Brooks some 40 years ago, but with his passing last year, the franchise is now edited by editorial cartoonist Steve Kelley.
You can order the book online.
Here are a few cartoons I submitted for consideration:








End of an era at Private Eye

$
0
0
From Procartoonists.




Private Eye magazine says farewell to its longtime art director Tony Rushton, with a party near its offices in Soho, London.

Tony has been with the magazine for 50 years, joining at issue 11, and is responsible for the old-school “cut n’ paste” look to which Britain’s leading satirical magazine has doggedly stuck over the decades.

He’s also the man the cartoonists deal with, though the ultimate decision on what goes in the mag is made by Ian Hislop, the editor. Pete Dredge, a Procartoonists.org member and Private Eye veteran (sorry, Pete) told us:

“Receiving a ‘Good morning, good morning, it’s Tony Rushton’ phonecall is usually a precursor of good news for cartoonist contributors to Private Eye. An acceptance of a single gag idea, or more rarely, a cartoon strip commission, is usually heralded by a call from Tony.

“Things do change at the Eye but usually inperceptibly – when did Colemanballs become Commentatorballs? – so it will be interesting to see how Tony’s departure after 50 years will have an impact on the unique look of the mag, a look that has borne the Rushton stamp for all these years.”

The Independent has a profile of Tony, which features this key quote:

“If you took away the cartoons from Private Eye it would be a very boring magazine, a worthy, boring magazine.”

Procartoonists.org says amen to that and wishes Tony Rushton the very best for his retirement.

Photo from V&A’s Private Eye at 50 video, via Eye magazine.

A few "End of the World" cartoons ...

$
0
0
... before it's too late to enjoy them.

Cartoon by Brian Gable




Cartoon by Dan Piraro



Cartoon by Roy Delgado


And  a few of mine:





Cartoon of the week (23)

"Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus" from Richard's Poor Almanac

Robert Ariail wins 2012 Berryman Award

$
0
0
Michael Cavna in Comic Riffs.



Robert Ariail’s cartoons about geopolitics can range from the warmly humorous (See: Greece as the economic houseguest who won’t leave) to the deadly serious (President Assad painting himself into a corner with Syrian blood on his hands).
For such cartoons that reflected that diversity of his approach, Ariail has just been named the 2012 recipient of the Berryman Award, which is presented by the National Press Foundation.

“I'm really thrilled and certainly humbled to be in the company of so many great cartoonists who have won this before me,” Ariail tells Comic Riffs on Wednesday of the honor, whose most recent winners include Nick Anderson (Houston Chronicle), Matt Wuerker (Politico) and Mike Keefe (now retired from the Denver Post) — Pulitzer winners all.
Ariail — a two-time Pulitzer finalist himself — now draws for Univeral Uclick and the Spartanburg (S.C.) Herald-Journal, where he landed after being pink-slipped by the State in Columbia.
“There's also a sense of validation in winning this prestigious national award,” Ariail tells Comic Riffs, “having been laid off from my longtime gig at The State three years ago.” .




The Clifford K. and James T. Berryman Award — named for Pulitzer-winning political cartoonists who were father and son — honors editorial cartoonists whose work “exemplifies a power to influence public opinion, good drawing, a striking effect and an effective use of humor.”
Ariail will receive a $2,500 prize from the National Press Foundation at an awards dinner in Washington.

Egyptian Cartoonist sued by rights NGO

$
0
0
From The Egypt Daily News.

You would have never been expelled from heaven had you voted in favour of the referendum!

The secretary-general of the National Centre for Defence of Freedoms has filed a lawsuit against Naguib Sawiris, the owner of Al-Masry Al-Youm newspaper, and their cartoonist Doaa El-Adl. The lawsuit, filed on Sunday, is in response to a cartoon depicting Adam and Eve, which the Secretary-General of the centre,  Salafist lawyer Khaled El-Masry said was insulting of the prophet.

The cartoon depicts Adam and Eve standing beneath an apple tree on a cloud. Before them stands an Egyptian man with angel wings and a halo, who declares the couple would have never been expelled from heaven had they voted in favour of the referendum.
The cartoon was first discovered by the centre on Saturday. Less than an hour after posting a screenshot and criticism of the article on the centre’s Facebook page, the newspaper removed the cartoon from their online publication. El-Adl said the decision to remove the drawing came after several people posted scathing comments to the drawing on their website.
Nevertheless, the centre announced it would be taking legal action against Sawiris and El-Adl, having already transferred the case to the chief prosecutor for investigation.
El-Adl said she was not worried about the lawsuit because she believes these events are “just deception” and those that politicise Islam look to religion to brainwash people by bringing god closer to the ballot box. “These people will tell you if you vote yes you will go to heaven but if you vote no then you will go to hell,” El-Adl added.
El-Adl point the finger at the Muslim Brotherhood for promoting the opinion that art demeans Islam. “Artistic freedom in Egypt is being attacked, and this will send Egypt backwards fast,” she warned.
El-Adl mused at the fact that she was being sued by the secretary-general of a centre aimed at protecting freedoms. This she says is another caricature behind her drawing, “a joke within a joke.” This is not the first time someone has been brought before the law for insulting Islam in one way or another.
“Anyone who tries to draw something with a beard will have it interpreted as an attack on Islam,” El-Adl added, pointing at recent accusations laid against satirist Bassem Youssef and Ibrahim Eissa. She believes Islamists are trying to tarnish the artists’ reputation through such lawsuits, with the aim of forbidding them from saying what they think.
El-Masry defended his position by pointing out that this was not the first time Sawiris has stirred controversy through offensive cartoons. Last year he tweeted a drawing of Mickey and Minnie Mouse garbed in a Niqab which generated a lot of anger.
El-Masry said he could not recommend a punishment, as it was in the hands of the courts to decide, but said that an apology was necessary and perhaps even sufficient. When asked if he believed the goal was to insult a prophet or to make a political statement on the Islamitization of the vote, El-Masry said he was not sure but Christians should not be allowed to criticise Islam and their Prophets.
El-Masry acknowledged that the portrayal of a prophet within Christianity was not forbidden, but accused Sawiris of abusing freedom of speech to insult people and their traditions. “Naguib Sawiris is a Christian, but the people working at his newspaper are Muslims and it should not be allowed.” El-Masry stressed that “the portrayal of prophets is a red line that we will not tolerate being crossed.”
El-Masry concluded that he would defend Christians and their rights if they came under attack.

Clay Bennett: 2012 in Editorial Cartoons

$
0
0


The original post is interactive but since I can't reproduce the effect, here are the cartoons in close-up:














Viewing all 2267 articles
Browse latest View live